Urology Research & Practice
Female Urology

LAPAROSCOPIC SACROCOLPOPEXY WITH DOUBLE MESH: OUR INITIAL EXPERIENCES

1.

İstanbul Üniversitesi Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi Üroloji Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul

2.

İstanbul Bilim Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Üroloji Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul

3.

İstanbul Üniversitesi Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı, İSTANBUL

Urol Res Pract 2005; 31: 253-258
Read: 1111 Downloads: 901 Published: 25 July 2019

Abstract

Introduction: Genital prolapse is a common problem in women, and repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a frequent pelvic reconstructive procedure performed in post hysterectomy patients. The aim of the treatment is to control the clinical manifestations and to prevent complications. There is wide variety of surgical techniques used to treat POP. Recently laparoscopic abdominal sacrocolpopexy (LASC) has been described for the treatment of symptomatic POP. LASC offers all the benefits of traditional open surgery with the minimal invasiveness of the transvaginal approach. In this study our aim is to assess the feasibility and results of LASC with two meshes along the anterior and posterior vaginal walls in correcting POP in our initial 5 cases.

Materials and Methods: Between October 2003 and May 2004 we performed LASC in 5 women. All patients reported previous hysterectomy and symptoms of POP, that came out 4-7 years after hysterectomy. Four patients had local vaginal symptoms. The other patient declared bilateral flank pain and radiological examinations showed bilateral hydronephrosis. Preoperative evaluation included POP staging using a standard questionnaire, pad test, residual urine volume, urodynamics, including Valsalva’s leak point pressure. LASC was carried out via transperitoneal route by using 4 trocars. We used 2x10 cm double mesh (anterior and posterior) for all cases. We performed laparoscopic left over cyst excision and right inguinal hernioraphy in the same patient as an additional procedure. The patients were post-operatively followed-up and evaluated at the first week, 1st, 3rd, and 6th months and later on with 6 months of intervals according to our protocol using a standard questionnaire. A nurse from the urodynamic unit helped the patients to fill a questionnaire to evaluate the results of the surgery at the 6th month of follow up.

Results: The mean patient age was 53.5 (39-70) years. There was no conversion to open surgery. Mean operation time was 205 minutes (ranged from 180 to 240). Mean hospital stay was 2 days (ranged from 2 to 4 days). Mean urethral catheterization period was 2 (range: 1-3) days. There were no early and late complications. Mean follow up time for the patients was 9 (6-11) months. Bilateral hydronephrosis in 1 patient improved significantly. All patients were rendered symptom free after the procedure. Furthermore they were satisfied with the operation and declared that they could accept the operation again as well as recommend it to their relatives or friends.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic abdominal sacrocolpopexy offers all the benefits of traditional open surgery with the minimal invasiveness of the transvaginal approach. LASC is a safe and effective procedure. Operative time and postoperative complications are related with surgeon’s experience. However it could be eliminated with increasing experience.

Files
EISSN 2980-1478